Home
Schedule
Members
GOY Standings
Results
Archives
Handicap Archive
More Tournaments
Statistics
Club Records
The Majors
Past Champions
Most Improved
Perpetual Trophies
History
Holes-in-One
Courses (rates)
Courses (rankings)
Courses (host tally)
Weather
Rain Advisor
Movies
Board Members
Board Meetings
Membership Info
Application
Constitution (by-laws)
Rules Forum
Etiquette
Posting Scores
Stories
Golf Jokes
News Archive
Celebrities
Segments
Web Site Awards
Web Stats
Optimal Web Viewing
Web Construction
Digital Camera
CAL Golf
CAL Golf Web Site
2004 NCAA Champs
Other Golf Club Webs
Lost & Found
In Memory
FAQs 

Tools:

Post a Score
Hcp. Index Lookup
Hcp. Index Formula
Differential Calculator
ESC Table
Course Handicap
Yardage Guides
Golfwits Yardage Guides
Calendar
Rules of Golf

2006 Season Photos:
San Geronimo
Metropolitan
Las Positas

2005 Season Photos:
Mare Island
Shadow Lakes
Las Positas
Wente Vineyards
Coyote Creek (Tournament)
Adobe Creek
Roddy Ranch
Eddie Reed Match Play*
Paradise Valley (Kooman)*
Diablo Grande (Legends)
Poppy Ridge (Fac/Staff)*
Tilden Park (2-Ball)*
Monterey Weekend
Alameda No. (Club Champ)*

2004 Season Photos:
Roddy Ranch
Las Positas
Wente Vineyards
Metropolitan
Rooster Run
Windsor
Eddie Reed Match Play*
Paradise Valley (Kooman)*
Stevinson Ranch
Poppy Ridge (Fac/Staff)*
Tilden Park (2-Ball)*
Gold Country Weekend
Boundary Oak (Club Champ)*

2003 Season Photos:
Windsor
Las Positas
Wente Vineyards
Shadow Lakes
Lone Tree
Bennett Valley
Eddie Reed Match Play*
Paradise Valley (Kooman)*
Spanos Park
Poppy Ridge (Fac/Staff)*
Tilden Park (2-Ball)*
Monterey Weekend
Chardonnay
Indian Valley (Club Champ)*

2002 Season Photos:
Bodega Harbour
Las Positas
Wente Vineyards
Adobe Creek
Rooster Run
Roddy Ranch
Eddie Reed Match Play*
Paradise Valley (Kooman)*
Monarch Bay
Boundary Oak (Fac/Staff)*
Tilden Park (2-Ball)*
Las Vegas Trip
Mare Island
Alameda No. (Club Champ)*

2001 Season Photos:
Windsor
Las Positas
Wente Vineyards
Diablo Grande (Ranch)
Rio Vista
Paradise Valley (Kooman)*
Eddie Reed Match Play*
Roddy Ranch
Spanos Park
Diablo Creek (Fac/Staff)*
Monarch Bay (2-Ball)*
Central Coast Trip
Poppy Ridge
Boundary Oak (Club Champ)*

2000 Season Photos:
Bodega Harbour
Las Positas
Wente Vineyards
Diablo Grande (Ranch)
Adobe Creek (Rained out)
Paradise Valley (Kooman)*
Eddie Reed Match Play*
San Juan Oaks
Poppy Ridge
Willow Park (Fac/Staff)*
Tilden Park (2-Ball)*
Sierras Trip
Rooster Run
Alameda So. (Club Champ)*

1999 Season Photos:
Diablo Creek (Fac/Staff)*
Tilden Park (2-Ball)*
Alameda North
Boundary Oak (Club Champ)*

pre-1999 Photos

* Major Tournament

Other Resources:


NCGA Website
NCGA Course Directory:
EastbaySF/Northbay, Southbay, Monterey
A-CD-FG-IJ-LM-OP-RS-TU-Z


USGA Website

News:

Leaderboards:

                                 

 


Tilden Park
UCGC vs. UCSF
(Inaugural Grudge Match)
& UCGC 2-Ball Championship

11th Event and 4th Major of 2003 Season 
Saturday, July 5, 2003


UCSF's Shaun Woo hits the opening shot of the inaugural UCGC vs. UCSF tournament. Shaun and teammate Cliff Lowell were soundly defeated in their match, but the UCSF squad ultimately prevailed in this historic first tournament between rival clubs.

UCGC will be dining on crow for the next twelve months. The UCSF squad narrowly defeated UCGC by a score of 26 1/2 to 24 1/2. Indeed there would have been a tie had even one front nine result favored UCGC rather than UCSF. Alas, this was not to be. There were many close matches, but when you boil it down, the UCSF teams were just scoring better. Last year at Tilden we had four teams with net scores below 60. In fact, our lowest scores were 55, 56, 57, and 59, followed by a pair of 60's and a pair of 61's. This year the course was in even better condition and our best net score was 60. Last year we only had eighteen teams competing, but ten of them (56%) scored net 63 or better. This year, with twenty-three teams competing, only four teams (17%) scored net 63 or better. Some might complain bitterly about having to give up an average of 14 strokes to each UCSF team, but when you look at the numbers we just didn't play up to our standard. This is not to say that it's beyond those quacks to have "doctored-up" their indexes. In fact, knowing them, it's to be expected. Nevertheless, we cannot rest all of the blame on their unscrupulous scoring practices, just most of it. We may not have issued them the spanking they so sorely deserved, but at the very least we taught them a lesson in good sportsmanship and fine etiquette. A lesson which will hopefully register within what remains of their ever shrinking and callous hearts. To this effect, we were the true winners of this inaugural tournament.

In the our own 2-Ball Championship, three teams tied at net 60. It all came down to the tiebreaker. Peter Werner and Dave Wherritt placed 3rd, Steve Obana and Dan Copenhagen placed 2nd, and Jeff Day and Aaron Walburg (pictured right) placed 1st. Day/Walburg won a very close second tiebreaker, their final six holes being stronger than the Obana/Copenhagen team's. Jeff Day supplied the 18th-hole drama, nailing a tricky 6-footer while a hoard of drunken (mostly UCSF) hecklers were watching from the grandstands. The putt secured the team's 2 and 1 win over the amazingly strong UCSF tandem featuring Martha "I'll distract them by taking off my shirt" Taylor (it had it's effect, or rather, pluralize that) and Kathy "I've only been playing for 18 months but I strike the ball better than you ever will" Lee (and she did), who combined for net 61. It also placed the team at net 60, which proved to be the necessary score for the 2-Ball Championship. As mentioned, scores were high this year and even teams that placed made many mistakes. Day/Walburg had three net bogies in their round, with two of them occurring on holes #1 and #2. Copenhagen/Obana had only one net bogey, but it occurred at hole #6, arguably the easiest hole on the course. Werner/Wherritt took their knocks on hole #10, when both players could only muster a net double bogey on the hole. Last year seven of the eighteen teams succeeded in avoiding any net bogies throughout the entire round. This year only two teams of twenty-three managed this feat. Currently online are updated GOY standings as well as many Tilden Park results and some pictures. Yet to come are more pictures and more details on the recap.

Tilden Park is usually not the speediest place to play a round of golf. This was true again. To begin with, the tee times were about 40 minutes behind schedule. Once on the course rounds were about 5 1/2 hours long. 

Neither team captain seemed to really mix and match the order in which they sent out their teams. It was basically best players to worst, or rather, low handicappers out first, then high handicappers.

Final Score
UCSF (the bad guys) 26.5
UCGC (the good guys) 24.5

2003 Bay Bridge Classic Match Results:
UCGC scores in blue
UCSF scores in red

Match Teams F9 B9 18 Pts. Cum.
#1 Steve Desimone 2 & Robert Desimone 7 30 31 61 3 3
Shaun Woo 2 & Cliff Lowell 8 31 32 63 0 0
#2 Ken Lloyd 3 & Paul Zingg 5 32 33 65 0.5 3.5
Tony Hunter 9 & Ron Brown 11 32 31 63 2.5 2.5
#3 Gary Vollen 20 & Rory McDonough 7 30 34 64 2 5.5
Huy Nguyen 10 & Dennis Burke 12 34 32 66 1 3.5
#4 Dave Webb 5 & Van Hall 7 31 35 66 1 6.5
John Taylor 11 & Chuck Marion 12 33 32 65 2 5.5
#5 Mike Birnbach 12 & Jeff Hazel 7 30 35 65 1 7.5
Patrick Taylor 11 & Mike Braisted 13 32 31 63 2 7.5
#6 Rick Guevara 13 & Chad Carey 7 29 35 64 1.5 9
Mike Connolly 12 & Jun Soriano 14 33 31 64 1.5 9
#7 Steve Obana 7 & Dan Copenhagen 8 31 29 60 2.5 11.5
Drew Pitts 13 & Bob Ignoffo 15 32 29 61 0.5 9.5
#8 Dave Lozow 5 & Ross Sakamoto 12 34 34 68 0 11.5
Ron Louie 15 & Dan Stites 16 32 31 63 3 12.5
#9 Dave Moers 5 & Martin Kitchener 12 33 36 69 1 12.5
Paul Schwartz 16 & Larry Watanabe 17 36 31 67 2 14.5
#10 Steve Hong 10 & Eddie Kleinhans 10 30 37 67 2 14.5
Ray Saavedra 19 & Bernie Lee 20 33 35 68 1 15.5
#11 Peter Werner 10 & Dave Wherritt 19 29 31 60 3 17.5
Dean Joelson 20 & Ron Jensen 22 31 34 65 0 15.5
#12 Ed Louie 14 & Joe Eric 15 37 32 69 0 17.5
Ed Howes 21 & Freeman Bradley 22 33 30 63 3 18.5
#13 Jeff Bordalampe 10 & Bill Marchant 16 33 34 67 1 18.5
Jim Sorensen 23 & Vickie Leow 27 35 30 65 2 20.5
#14 Edgar Johnson 12 & Chris Brown 14 32 35 67 1 19.5
Al Laurin 24 & Mark Bell 24 34 30 64 2 22.5
#15 Aaron Walburg 14 & Jeff Day 14 31 29 60 2 21.5
Kathy Lee 28 & Martha Taylor 30 30 31 61 1 23.5
#16 Boyd McCalsin 24 & Ralph Hill 9 32 33 65 0 21.5
Andrew DeFranco 31 & Mark Young 33 28 27 55 3 26.5
#17 Kelly Alavarez 23 & Bob Sternbach 16 33 33 66 3 24.5
Chuck Yingling 32 (wd) & Janet Scott 37 39 36 75 0 26.5


Most Points Earned by Any Team
Teams involved in Match are here ranked by points earned, then by net score. The most shocking results was Drew Pitts & Bob Ignoffo scoring a net 61, but still only earning .5 points. They had the misfortune of being paired against Steve Obana and Dan Copenhagen, who turned in a net 60.

Teams (UCGC = blue; UCSF = red) F9 B9 18 Pts.
1st Andrew DeFranco 31 & Mark Young 33 28 27 55 3.0
Peter Werner 10 & Dave Wherritt 19 29 31 60 3.0
Steve Desimone 2 & Robert Desimone 7 30 31 61 3.0
Ron Louie 15 & Dan Stites 16 32 31 63 3.0
Ed Howes 21 & Freeman Bradley 22 33 30 63 3.0
Kelly Alavarez 23 & Bob Sternbach 16 33 33 66 3.0
7th Steve Obana 7 & Dan Copenhagen 8 31 29 60 2.5
Tony Hunter 9 & Ron Brown 11 32 31 63 2.5
9th Aaron Walburg 14 & Jeff Day 14 31 29 60 2.0
Patrick Taylor 11 & Mike Braisted 13 32 31 63 2.0
Gary Vollen 20 & Rory McDonough 7 30 34 64 2.0
Al Laurin 24 & Mark Bell 24 34 30 64 2.0
John Taylor 11 & Chuck Marion 12 33 32 65 2.0
Jim Sorensen 23 & Vickie Leow 27 35 30 65 2.0
Paul Schwartz 16 & Larry Watanabe 17 36 31 67 2.0
Steve Hong 10 & Eddie Kleinhans 10 30 37 67 2.0
17th Rick Guevara 13 & Chad Carey 7 29 35 64 1.5
Mike Connolly 12 & Jun Soriano 14 33 31 64 1.5
19th Kathy Lee 28 & Martha Taylor 30 30 31 61 1.0
Mike Birnbach 12 & Jeff Hazel 7 30 35 65 1.0
Huy Nguyen 10 & Dennis Burke 12 34 32 66 1.0
Dave Webb 5 & Van Hall 7 31 35 66 1.0
Jeff Bordalampe 10 & Bill Marchant 16 33 34 67 1.0
Edgar Johnson 12 & Chris Brown 14 32 35 67 1.0
Ray Saavedra 19 & Bernie Lee 20 33 35 68 1.0
Dave Moers 5 & Martin Kitchener 12 33 36 69 1.0
27th Drew Pitts 13 & Bob Ignoffo 15 32 29 61 0.5
Ken Lloyd 3 & Paul Zingg 5 32 33 65 0.5
29th Shaun Woo 2 & Cliff Lowell 8 31 32 63 0.0
Dean Joelson 20 & Ron Jensen 22 31 34 65 0.0
Boyd McCalsin 24 & Ralph Hill 9 32 33 65 0.0
Dave Lozow 5 & Ross Sakamoto 12 34 34 68 0.0
Ed Louie 14 & Joe Eric 15 37 32 69 0.0
Chuck Yingling 32 (wd) & Janet Scott 37 39 36 75 0.0


14 Strokes per Team

Were there was an average of 14 strokes given to each UCSF team. Since each player received an average of 7 strokes, each team of two players received 14 strokes on average. Only in one match did UCSF actually have to give strokes. It was: Gary Vollen 20 & Rory McDonough 7 vs. Huy Nguyen 10 & Dennis Burke 11. UCGC won this match 2 to 1. Now, this is not to say that giving strokes necessarily translates as an advantage, however it can be a bit daunting.

Total Strokes Received Players Avg. Strokes per player
UCGC 374 34 11
UCSF 612 34 18

 

High Scores this Year

There was lots of evidence that our scores at Tilden were higher than average this year. Tilden Park has played host to nineteen of our twenty-four 2-Ball Championships. The lowest winning net score at Tilden was 55. This happened twice. The highest winning score at Tilden was a 60, which occurred four times. The average winning score at Tilden is net 57.74. The average 2nd place finish is 59.46. See Tilden Park history below:

History of 2-Ball at Tilden Park
Year Winning Team Score 2nd Location
1st 1980 George Dea & Art Ramos 61 62 Sonoma
2nd 1981 Roger Chauvin & Doyle Wolfe 57 60 Sonoma
3rd 1982 Jerry Glenn & Rollie Otto 61 63 Skywest
4th 1983 Jerry Glenn & Rollie Otto 59 61 Tilden Park
5th 1984 Steve Noland & Don Wade 60 61 Tilden Park
6th 1985 Rakesh Sharma & Ram Sharma 57 60 Tilden Park
7th 1986 Bob Desimone & Boyd McCaslin 57 57 Tilden Park
8th 1987 Eva Ewen & Jud Whitehead 59 59 Tilden Park
9th 1988 Hank Liese & Fritz Stern 55 57 Tilden Park
10th 1989 Harry Hubinger & Fred Nelson 58 59 Tilden Park
11th 1990 Ben Greenspan & Ken Lloyd 56 60 Tilden Park
12th 1991 Ernie Hudson & Saul Geiser 60 60 Tilden Park
13th 1992 Ken Lloyd & Paul Zingg 58 58 Tilden Park
14th 1993 Duane Kent & Bill Marchant 57 57 Tilden Park
15th 1994 John Hubinger & Jeff Nelson 56 58 Tilden Park
16th 1995 Dale Steele & Bob Traum 56 57 Tilden Park
17th 1996 Chris Blair & Ram Sharma 58 59 Tilden Park
18th 1997 Jeff Hazel & Mike Birnbach 58 58 Tilden Park
19th 1998 Mike O'Neill & Ryan Lai 61 63 Mtn Shadows.N.
20th 1999 Mike O'Neill & Ryan Lai 60 60 Tilden Park
21st 2000 John Carlson & Barry Woods 58 58 Tilden Park
22nd 2001 Robert Desimone & Steve Desimone 61 64 Monarch Bay
23rd 2002 David Lozow & Barry Woods 55 56 Tilden Park
24th 2003 Jeff Day & Aaron Walburg 60 60 Tilden Park
57.73 59.46 Tilden Avg.

 


It was a perfect day at Tilden. For most of the summer the east bay has been fogged in. Today was the fog was absent and temperatures reached the mid-70's. There was also no wind. Conditions were ideal for really low scores, but there weren't many of them. In fact, upon hearing how high the scores were, Chris Aronson berated his annual partner Mike Armstrong for not being able to make it. They always seem to break 60.


It seemed like the entire UCSF team arrived early. In fact, a small, and supportive gallery of their players came and watched the early groups tee off. Gathered on the practice green to discuss strategy are two teams, Tony Hunter & Ron Brown, and John Taylor & Chuck Marion.


While our folks generally arrived at the first tee stuffing their shirts into their pants after a hurried drive to the course, the UCSF squad arrived early and handed out new logo shirts to each member. These were a very organized bunch.  


Larry Watanabe (of UCSF) arrived about two hours before his tee time. Although he didn't tee off until mid-way through the tournament, he came early to hit balls and support his team. We gotta hand it to them. UCSF has got spirit. 


Dan Copenhagen warming up on the top story of the 3-teired range. You can tell our players from theirs, because we're not all wearing blue shirts. Dan shot a net 69. He was one of only six UCGC members to break net par.


Dave Webb's wristy putting stroke. Dave has one of the most unusual putting strokes in the club.


The two opposing generals greeting one-another prior to the beginning of what is expected to be a long-standing rivalry. Clifford was working Steve over with some head games (literally), by donning the Stanford cap. This was probably a bad move. Like a raging bull whose caught a glimpse of red, Steve and son Robert targeted the opposing team and soundly defeated them 3-0.


Cliff is a colorful character, and a colorful character needs colorful gear. Here Cliff shows off his purple and yellow driver.


Cliff and teammate Shaun Woo turned in an impressive 63. Steve and Robert nevertheless earned a 3-0 win by shooting a 61, the smallest possible margin for such a win.


Robert and Steve, turned in individual net scores which ranked 1st and 5th among the 45 UCGC participants. They came up unlucky in the ham & egg department however, finishing 4th in the 2-Ball Championship. But don't feel sorry for them! They've each won twice this year. Moreover,  two years ago they won this event at Monarch Bay.

Only 5 of the 45 UCGC golfers managed to par the difficult opening hole. The 5 players were Robert and Steve Desimone, Gary Vollen, Jeff Hazel, and Chad Carey. It's possibly the toughest opening hole in the Bay Area.


Steve shot a 2-under par net 66. These represented both the lowest gross score and the lowest net score among any UCGC player. Steve got the team started off on the right foot, but throughout the rest of the afternoon our teams struggled.


Ron Brown watches his opening drive. Ron is a Director of the UCSF club.


Ron was paired with Tony Hunter, the club's webmaster (http://itsa.ucsf.edu/~ucsfgc/). They combined to take down our #2 team of Ken Lloyd and Paul Zingg. This is not an easy task, as Ken and Paul are one of our most-experienced teams. In fact they are our 1992 champions. Ron and Tony won the match 2 1/2 to 1/2. They shot an impressive 63, to our guy's 65.


Paul turned in a 75 gross, 70 net. This was one of our better scores.


Ken shot the day's second lowest gross score, an even par 70. His net 67 was also second only to Steve's 66. Just as Steve and Robert, they had a poor draw in the ham and eggs category.


Chuck Marion watch's UCSF's Treasurer Dennis Burke tee off. Dennis Burke and Huy Nguyen combined for a net 66. They were defeated 2 and 1, however by Gary Vollen and Rory McDonough. By the way, of the 17 matches, this was the only one in which we received strokes. The UCSF team is comprised entirely of hacks (and quacks).


Rory McDonough hits his opening drive. Very few people pared the opening hole. It's possibly the toughest opening hole in the Bay Area.


Gary Vollen and partner Rory both shot net 74 individually, but had a pretty healthy dose of ham and eggs, and combined for a net 64.


Here we have group #4. For UCSF are John Taylor and Chuck Marion. For UCGC are Van Hall and Dave Webb. Van's birdie on #18 was impressive, but the Hall/Webb team had some ugly ham & egg action, with net bogies on holes #6, #10, and #15. Nevertheless, they won the front nine and earned a point for the good guys.


Mike Birnbach and Jeff Hazel had a blistering 30 on the front nine, but got beat up on the back. That's where Patrick Taylor and Mike Braisted assumed control. They ultimately turned in a net 63 which edged past the Mike and Jeff by 2 strokes.


Patrick was wearing his lucky sweatshirt. He's had it for many years.


Rick Guevara and Chad Carey turned in a 29 on the front nine. At that point they were in a tie for low net with Peter Werner and Dave Wherritt, who also shot a 29 on the front. The back nine was a different story. They lost a bit of mojo, but still split their match vs. Mike Connolly and Jun Soriano.


Part of the UCSF 1st tee booster's club - Bob Ignoffo, Larry Watanabe, Bernie Lee, and Ron Louie are impressed with the caliber of play exhibited by the members of UCGC. They would be hard-pressed to admit it, but in general, UCGC was very much admired by UCSF. A common UCSF thought was, "Those guys are so good." The other popular thought was, "I wish I was in that club, those guys are so cool. I wish I could be more like them."


This was one of the day's most competitive and closest matches. Drew Pitts and Bob Ignoffo shot a net 61 and still lost to Dan Copenhagen and Steve Obana, who turned in a net 60. The score was 2.5 to .5, which seems a bitter pill to swallow for the medical team.


Steve Obana's opening drive. Steve and Dan recently competed in the CGA Net Amateur Match Play Tournament.


Dan Copenhagen on #1. Steve and Dan were part of the 3-way tie for the UCGC's 2-Ball Championship. They placed second in the tiebreaker process, which came down to scores over the final six holes.


Dan Stites on #1. Dan is former Chairman of the Department of Laboratory Medicine. 


Ron Louie and Dan Stites cleaned up with a 3-0 win over Dave Lozow and Ross Sakamoto. Last year Lozow and Barry Woods won the 2-Ball with a net 55. 


Ross Sakamoto with his opening drive.


Dave Lozow chips up to the 2nd green. He would sink the resulting putt for par.


Martin Kitchener shot the best round of his life in last year's 2-Ball at Tilden. Martin turned in a 77 (net 60) last year. This year he didn't have his "A" game. He and partner Dave Moers turned in a net 69, and were beaten by Paul Schwartz and Larry Watanabe 2-1. 


Dave Moers' drive on #8, a hole he would birdie.


Paul Schwartz with his non-conforming head cover.


Steve Hong and Eddie Kleinhans turned in a smokin' 30 on the front. The wheel fell off a bit on the back with a 37, however it was just enough to beat Ray Saavedra and Bernie Lee, 2 to1 in their match.


Eddie Kleinhans reacts to his approach at #8. He went on to par the hole.


Dave Wherritt and Peter Werner cruised to a 3-0 win over Dean Joelson and Ron Jensen. At the turn, Dave and Peter had shot a 6-under 29, and were tied for the lead with Rick Guevara and Chad Carey. 


Ed Louie and Eric Joe were shut out by Freeman Bradley and Ed Howes, who turned in an impressive 63.


Eric and Ed working together on #4. Eric would par the hole.


With a net 55 in his future, Mark Young, donning his typical shade hat, plays it cool. Mark and partner Andrew DeFranco were the second to the last UCSF team to go out, but they returned with the top score. 55 was 6 strokes better than the next best UCSF score (61), and 5 strokes better than any UCGC score (3 had net 60). 


The UCSF squad was trying hard to psyche out the opposition. Here several members break out into a spontaneous and very intimidating club-holding exercise. Next year the UCGC will have to try and come up with it's own form of intimidation. Hopefully we can come up with something equally powerful.


Take a wild guess where Vickie Leow's ball went off the first tee. Yes, you guessed it. The ball went left, directly where she was lined up. Her ball came to rest beneath the trees. Hopefully she's learned a valuable lesson about golf. 


Al Laurin and Mark Bell  beat Chris Brown and Edgar Johnson 2 to 1,  thanks in large to their 30 on the back. 


Mark Bell follows his drive on #7. 


Edgar Johnson earned a bogey on the difficult finishing hole.


Boyd McCaslin and Ralph Hill had the undesirable distinction of facing Mark Young and Andrew DeFranco, who turned in a net 55, the day's most impressive round by far. Even though Boyd and Ralph turned in a 65, the match was never close. While standing on the second tee they had little idea how long this day would be.


Ralph tends the flag for Andrew DeFranco on #9. Mark and Andrew were from a different planet. They assembled the best front nine score (28) and the best back nine score (27).


Jack King watches Yun Akinaga watch his drive on #9. Both men are cool as cucumbers. Yun bogeyd the difficult uphill hole and Jack earned a par. These men were part of the all-UCGC foursomes. They were paired with Paul Higaki and Lloyd Crenna. The two teams scored 67 and 73, respectively.


Kathy Lee efficiently reaches down for the tee while simultaneously following her drive on #1. She and Playing partner Martha Taylor combined for a net 61, which placed third among UCSF teams.


Kathy has amazing control and balance. She also makes great contact with the ball. The fact that she's only been playing for 18 month is disturbing to all of us lifelong hackers.


Kathy reacts to a putt which comes up short on the 5th green. It's by far the most difficult green on the course.


After an amazing drive on #17, Kathy pushed her approach shot to the right on. Over the last 2 holes things had tightened up in their match vs. Jeff Day and Aaron Walburg. Going into #17 Kathy and Martha had won the front nine and were leading the overall 18 by a stroke. They were tied on the back nine. A net birdie by Aaron on #17 and one by Jeff on #18 turned the match around.


Martha Taylor hit the most amazing pop-up on her opening drive. It nearly went straight up, landed on the corrugated roof which covers the red tees of the first hole, and bounced down to the red tees. She quickly recomposed herself, however, and her team never fell behind until the final putt on the 18th hole.


Martha reacts to her delicate chip on #12. 


Martha also has great control in her swing. She strikes the ball very well and has a meticulous style of play which lends itself to consistent scoring. Martha currently sits atop UCSF's 2003 Player of the Year Leaderboard. The 9 points she earned by placing 3rd at Tilden catapulted her past David Kan, who did not play. Drew Pitts and Andrew DeFranco also made up massive ground, earning 20 points each for their Tilden win. 20 points is the most points one can earn in a UCSF tournament. The only other tournament which earns 20 points is the 2-day event. See also the UCSF 'Player of the Year' Point System.

UCSF Player of the Year Standings
(as of 7/6/03)

1st Taylor, Martha 49
2nd Kan, David 44
3rd Young, Mark 41
4th Pitts, Drew 38
5th Brown, Ron 30
6th DeFranco, Andrew 27
Ignoffo, Bob 27
8th Hunter, Tony 26
9th Leow, Vickie 25
Lowell, Cliff 25
Taylor, John 25
12th Soriano, Jun 24
13th Buick, Jim 21
Connolly, Mike 21
Fisher, Al 21
Garner, Mike 21
17th Shaver, John 20
18th Burke, Dennis 19
Kathirgamu, Shiva 19
20th Lee, Kathy 18


Jeff Day hit a great approach shot on #10. His par was clutch, as his partner was basically out of the hole.


Jeff had another amazingly important score on #16. Once again he was on his own and made par with a chip and an 8-foot putt following his drive.


The celebration began early for UCSF. As drunken hecklers overlooked the 18th hole, Martha Taylor and Tony Hunter scrutinize the latest results.


The raucous crowd peered down upon the 18th green, cheering and jeering perceived successes and failures by the lowly finishers. Jeff Day showed mental toughness in the face of this difficult situation, and sank a critical 6-footer to win the 18-hole score in their match. It was also required for the 2-Ball score which won the championship.


Dan Stites is double-checking his scorecard. Dan and partner Ron Louie swept their match 3-0 vs. Dave Lozow & Ross Sakamoto, who, following the match were in need of medical attention.


Jun Soriano relaxes on the veranda. Jun is a proponent of the amazingly expensive Honma Golf Clubs. Honma golf clubs are hand-forged and "made as carefully as a classic samurai sword". Clubs vary in price, but generally cost at least $1200 per set. However, one may spend as much as $15,000 per set, if one desires.


Bob Ignoffo, Dan Stites, Ron Brown, and Chuck Marion hover over the carcass of a freshly killed pitcher of beer.


While most UCSF members were relaxing and drinking beer, Tony Hunter and Cliff Lowell were busy with scoring duties.


Beer was consumed that afternoon. Beer-drinking following a round of golf is a tradition initiated by the U.C. Golf Club.


Mike Birnbach and Van Hall know how to relax after a difficult day on the links. 


After his round, it's time for Peter Werner to place his watch back on his wrist. Dave Wherritt is amused. Dave gets extra points for trying to distract the opponent with his wild attire. This strategy was brilliant, as they contributed 3 points for the team effort. 


Martha Taylor and Ed Howes look on as the scoring goes down to the wire.


Tony and Cliff are happy with the results. 


UCSF 26 1/2  UCGC 24 1/2.
The final tally was disturbing, to say the least. (Click for large blow-up of results.)


The four women who played in the event were all from the UCSF club. Vickie Leow, Janet Scott, Martha Taylor, and Kathy Lee are a spirited and fun bunch.


While the UCSF men were distracted with beer, Aaron was quietly stealing-away their women-folk. Left to right are Vickie Leow, Martha Taylor, Casanova, Kathy Lee, and Janet Scott.


The temporary perpetual trophy went to the UCSF club. Next year the "real" trophy will fine a proper home.


Steve shows true sportsmanship and congratulates Cliff, in spite of his Stanford cap. Steve had won his match 3-0, but bravely accepted his team's defeat.


Aaron Walburg and Jeff Day (net 60) were about the only UCGC members still smiling at the day's end. With such low scores last year, they had no ideas about winning the 2-ball. They were focused on their UCSF opponents, Martha and Kathy, whom they edged out on the 18th hole after having been down to them all day.


The effects of alcohol are greater at high altitude. 


UCSF was very well-prepared for a team effort, having generated team shirts, team score sheets, and even a team banner! We'll have to step it up a notch if we want to hold our own against this formidable new opponent.

(Of the 75 pictures that reached this page [a record, over 200 were taken all-together], Steve contributed six and UCSF's John Taylor contributed four.)

 

Complete Flight Results & Analysis:
Prepare to be overwhelmed with useless information. Below are results along with several in-depth analysis of the results. The analysis are perhaps only vaguely interesting to most visitors and at most mean little in this 2-ball format which can have varying affects on individual scores. However, in the interests of pure folly these results have been broken down to highlight and/or reveal any interesting individual performances or anomalies.

2-Ball Team Scores:

Teams are listed in order of finish with best-scoring (net) team member listed first. Tiebreakers for team net scores are lowest net score for back nine. If the back nine net scores are equal, then the lowest net score for last six holes serves as the second tiebreaker.

    INDIVIDUAL TEAM  
  Teams Hcp Out In Grs Net Out In Net Tiebreak#2
1 A. Walburg 14 38 45 83 69 31 29 60 19
1 J. Day 14 47 45 92 78        
2 S. Obana 7 37 38 75 68 31 29 60 21
2 D. Copenhagen 8 40 37 77 69        
3 D. Wherritt 19 43 48 91 72 29 31 60  
3 P. Werner 10 43 41 84 74        
4 S. Desimone 2 34 34 68 66 30 31 61  
4 R. Desimone 7 36 40 76 69        
5 G. Vollen 20 44 50 94 74 30 34 64  
5 R. Mcdonough 7 40 41 81 74        
6 R. Guevara 13 39 44 83 70 29 35 64  
6 C. Carey 7 38 42 80 73        
7 C. Wallace 24 49 49 98 74 35 30 65  
7 C. Baker 31 57 49 106 75        
8 K. Lloyd 3 36 34 70 67 32 33 65 23
8 P. Zingg 5 39 36 75 70        
9 B. Mccaslin 24 48 51 99 75 32 33 65 24
9 R. Hill 9 44 43 87 78        
10 J. Hazel 7 38 42 80 73 30 35 65  
10 M. Birnbach 12 40 46 86 74        
11 K. Alvarez 23 53 47 100 77 33 33 66  
11 B. Sternbach 16 50 44 94 78        
12 V. Hall 7 38 41 79 72 31 35 66  
12 D. Webb 5 43 38 81 76        
13 J. King 25 49 49 98 73 34 33 67  
13 Y. Akinaga 18 48 48 96 78        
14 B. Marchant 16 43 43 86 70 33 34 67  
14 J. Bordalampe 10 41 46 87 77        
15 C. Brown 14 44 44 88 74 32 35 67  
15 E. Johnson 12 43 46 89 77        
16 S. Hong 10 39 45 84 74 30 37 67  
16 E. Kleinhans 10 38 47 85 75        
17 E. Biglin 7 44 38 82 75 35 33 68  
17 C. Maters 8 41 42 83 75        
18 D. Lozow 5 38 39 77 72 34 34 68  
18 R. Sakamoto 12 44 41 85 73        
19 E. Louie 14 47 43 90 76 37 32 69  
19 E. Joe 15 51 43 94 79        
20 D. Moers 5 37 41 78 73 33 36 69 24
20 M. Kitchener 12 45 42 87 75        
21 H. Teasdale 23 46 47 93 70 33 36 70 25
21 C. Shute 23 51 51 102 79        
22 P. Higaki 11 47 49 96 85 37 36 73  
22 L. Crenna 20 52 54 106 86        
23 M. Hearn 23 50 49 99 76 38 38 76  
23 B. Flushman 25     wd          

 

Overall Individual Low Gross:
Other notations include:
Tie = Net tie-breaker
INrnk = Net ranking - Where an individual's performance ranks within all net scores.
Anc = "Anchor" rating - The precise formula is "2-(IndivNet / TeamNet)". This is a very crude approximation meant to reveal how much an individual was responsible for the team's score - the higher the percentage, the greater proportion of positive effect on team score by an individual. For instance, Mike Hearn was playing as a single and was 100% responsible for his team's score.
AncRnk = Anchor rating, ranked among all scores.
AncDif = This is perhaps the most telling measure of team contribution. It's the difference between Anchor ratings between teammates. The higher the number, the more inequality there was between contributions by teammates. 
Plc = Where the team placed.

Member Hcp Out In Grs Net Tie INrnk Anc AncRnk AncDif Out In Net Plc
1st S. Desimone 2 34 34 68 66 33.0 1 0.92 9 0.05 30 31 61 4
2nd K. Lloyd 3 36 34 70 67 32.5 2 0.97 3 0.05 32 33 65 8
3rd S. Obana 7 37 38 75 68 34.5 3 0.87 22 0.02 31 29 60 2
P. Zingg 5 39 36 75 70 33.5 7 0.92 8 0.05 32 33 65 8
5th R. Desimone 7 36 40 76 69 36.5 5 0.87 21 0.05 30 31 61 4
6th D. Copenhagen 8 40 37 77 69 33.0 4 0.85 30 0.02 31 29 60 2
D. Lozow 5 38 39 77 72 36.5 11 0.94 6 0.01 34 34 68 18
8th D. Moers 5 37 41 78 73 38.5 16 0.94 5 0.03 33 36 69 20
9th V. Hall 7 38 41 79 72 37.5 12 0.91 12 0.06 31 35 66 12
10th C. Carey 7 38 42 80 73 38.5 16 0.86 25 0.05 29 35 64 6
J. Hazel 7 38 42 80 73 38.5 16 0.88 20 0.02 30 35 65 10
12th R. Mcdonough 7 40 41 81 74 37.5 22 0.84 35 0.00 30 34 64 5
D. Webb 5 43 38 81 76 35.5 32 0.85 32 0.06 31 35 66 12
14th E. Biglin 7 44 38 82 75 34.5 27 0.90 15 0.00 35 33 68 17
15th A. Walburg 14 38 45 83 69 38.0 6 0.85 30 0.15 31 29 60 1
R. Guevara 13 39 44 83 70 37.5 10 0.91 13 0.05 29 35 64 6
C. Maters 8 41 42 83 75 38.0 29 0.90 15 0.00 35 33 68 17
18th S. Hong 10 39 45 84 74 40.0 23 0.90 17 0.01 30 37 67 16
P. Werner 10 43 41 84 74 36.0 19 0.77 44 0.03 29 31 60 3
20th R. Sakamoto 12 44 41 85 73 35.0 14 0.93 7 0.01 34 34 68 18
E. Kleinhans 10 38 47 85 75 42.0 31 0.88 19 0.01 30 37 67 16
22nd B. Marchant 16 43 43 86 70 35.0 8 0.96 4 0.10 33 34 67 14
M. Birnbach 12 40 46 86 74 40.0 23 0.86 23 0.02 30 35 65 10
24th M. Kitchener 12 45 42 87 75 36.0 28 0.91 10 0.03 33 36 69 20
J. Bordalampe 10 41 46 87 77 41.0 37 0.85 28 0.10 33 34 67 14
R. Hill 9 44 43 87 78 38.5 40 0.80 42 0.05 32 33 65 9
27th C. Brown 14 44 44 88 74 37.0 20 0.90 17 0.04 32 35 67 15
28th E. Johnson 12 43 46 89 77 40.0 36 0.85 28 0.04 32 35 67 15
29th E. Louie 14 47 43 90 76 36.0 33 0.90 14 0.04 37 32 69 19
30th D. Wherritt 19 43 48 91 72 38.5 13 0.80 42 0.03 29 31 60 3
31st J. Day 14 47 45 92 78 38.0 39 0.70 45 0.15 31 29 60 1
32nd H. Teasdale 23 46 47 93 70 35.5 9 0.99 2 0.13 33 36 69 21
33rd G. Vollen 20 44 50 94 74 40.0 23 0.84 35 0.00 30 34 64 5
B. Sternbach 16 50 44 94 78 36.0 38 0.82 41 0.02 33 33 66 11
E. Joe 15 51 43 94 79 35.5 42 0.86 26 0.04 37 32 69 19
36th Y. Akinaga 18 48 48 96 78 39.0 41 0.84 37 0.07 34 33 67 13
P. Higaki 11 47 49 96 85 43.5 44 0.84 38 0.01 37 36 73 22
38th J. King 25 49 49 98 73 36.5 15 0.91 11 0.07 34 33 67 13
C. Wallace 24 49 49 98 74 37.0 20 0.86 23 0.02 35 30 65 7
40th B. Mccaslin 24 48 51 99 75 39.0 30 0.85 33 0.05 32 33 65 9
M. Hearn 23 50 49 99 76 37.5 34 1.00 1 1.00 38 38 76 23
42nd K. Alvarez 23 53 47 100 77 35.5 35 0.83 39 0.02 33 33 66 11
43rd C. Shute 23 51 51 102 79 39.5 43 0.86 26 0.13 33 36 69 21
44th C. Baker 31 57 49 106 75 33.5 26 0.85 33 0.02 35 30 65 7
L. Crenna 20 52 54 106 86 44.0 45 0.82 40 0.01 37 36 73 22
46th B. Flushman 25 wd 46 0.00 46 1.00 38 38 76 23

 

Overall Individual Low Net:
Other notations include:
Tie = Net tie-breaker
INrnk = Net ranking - Where an individual's performance ranks within all net scores.
Anc = "Anchor" rating - The precise formula is "2-(IndivNet / TeamNet)". This is a very crude approximation meant to reveal how much an individual was responsible for the team's score - the higher the percentage, the greater proportion of positive effect on team score by an individual. For instance, Mike Hearn was playing as a single and was 100% responsible for his team's score.
AncRnk = Anchor rating, ranked among all scores.
AncDif = This is perhaps the most telling measure of team contribution. It's the difference between Anchor ratings between teammates. The higher the number, the more inequality there was between contributions by teammates. 
Plc = Where the team placed.

Member Hcp Out In Grs Net Tie INrnk Anc AncRnk AncDif Out In Net Plc
1st S. Desimone 2 34 34 68 66 33.0 1 0.92 9 0.05 30 31 61 4
2nd K. Lloyd 3 36 34 70 67 32.5 2 0.97 3 0.05 32 33 65 8
3rd S. Obana 7 37 38 75 68 34.5 3 0.87 22 0.02 31 29 60 2
4th D. Copenhagen 8 40 37 77 69 33.0 4 0.85 30 0.02 31 29 60 2
5th R. Desimone 7 36 40 76 69 36.5 5 0.87 21 0.05 30 31 61 4
6th A. Walburg 14 38 45 83 69 38.0 6 0.85 30 0.15 31 29 60 1
7th P. Zingg 5 39 36 75 70 33.5 7 0.92 8 0.05 32 33 65 8
8th B. Marchant 16 43 43 86 70 35.0 8 0.96 4 0.10 33 34 67 14
9th H. Teasdale 23 46 47 93 70 35.5 9 0.99 2 0.13 33 36 69 21
10th R. Guevara 13 39 44 83 70 37.5 10 0.91 13 0.05 29 35 64 6
11th D. Lozow 5 38 39 77 72 36.5 11 0.94 6 0.01 34 34 68 18
12th V. Hall 7 38 41 79 72 37.5 12 0.91 12 0.06 31 35 66 12
13th D. Wherritt 19 43 48 91 72 38.5 13 0.80 42 0.03 29 31 60 3
14th R. Sakamoto 12 44 41 85 73 35.0 14 0.93 7 0.01 34 34 68 18
15th J. King 25 49 49 98 73 36.5 15 0.91 11 0.07 34 33 67 13
16th D. Moers 5 37 41 78 73 38.5 16 0.94 5 0.03 33 36 69 20
C. Carey 7 38 42 80 73 38.5 16 0.86 25 0.05 29 35 64 6
J. Hazel 7 38 42 80 73 38.5 16 0.88 20 0.02 30 35 65 10
19th P. Werner 10 43 41 84 74 36.0 19 0.77 44 0.03 29 31 60 3
20th C. Brown 14 44 44 88 74 37.0 20 0.90 17 0.04 32 35 67 15
C. Wallace 24 49 49 98 74 37.0 20 0.86 23 0.02 35 30 65 7
22nd R. Mcdonough 7 40 41 81 74 37.5 22 0.84 35 0.00 30 34 64 5
23rd S. Hong 10 39 45 84 74 40.0 23 0.90 17 0.01 30 37 67 16
M. Birnbach 12 40 46 86 74 40.0 23 0.86 23 0.02 30 35 65 10
G. Vollen 20 44 50 94 74 40.0 23 0.84 35 0.00 30 34 64 5
26th C. Baker 31 57 49 106 75 33.5 26 0.85 33 0.02 35 30 65 7
27th E. Biglin 7 44 38 82 75 34.5 27 0.90 15 0.00 35 33 68 17
28th M. Kitchener 12 45 42 87 75 36.0 28 0.91 10 0.03 33 36 69 20
29th C. Maters 8 41 42 83 75 38.0 29 0.90 15 0.00 35 33 68 17
30th B. Mccaslin 24 48 51 99 75 39.0 30 0.85 33 0.05 32 33 65 9
31st E. Kleinhans 10 38 47 85 75 42.0 31 0.88 19 0.01 30 37 67 16
32nd D. Webb 5 43 38 81 76 35.5 32 0.85 32 0.06 31 35 66 12
33rd E. Louie 14 47 43 90 76 36.0 33 0.90 14 0.04 37 32 69 19
34th M. Hearn 23 50 49 99 76 37.5 34 1.00 1 1.00 38 38 76 23
35th K. Alvarez 23 53 47 100 77 35.5 35 0.83 39 0.02 33 33 66 11
36th E. Johnson 12 43 46 89 77 40.0 36 0.85 28 0.04 32 35 67 15
37th J. Bordalampe 10 41 46 87 77 41.0 37 0.85 28 0.10 33 34 67 14
38th B. Sternbach 16 50 44 94 78 36.0 38 0.82 41 0.02 33 33 66 11
39th J. Day 14 47 45 92 78 38.0 39 0.70 45 0.15 31 29 60 1
40th R. Hill 9 44 43 87 78 38.5 40 0.80 42 0.05 32 33 65 9
41st Y. Akinaga 18 48 48 96 78 39.0 41 0.84 37 0.07 34 33 67 13
42nd E. Joe 15 51 43 94 79 35.5 42 0.86 26 0.04 37 32 69 19
43rd C. Shute 23 51 51 102 79 39.5 43 0.86 26 0.13 33 36 69 21
44th P. Higaki 11 47 49 96 85 43.5 44 0.84 38 0.01 37 36 73 22
45th L. Crenna 20 52 54 106 86 44.0 45 0.82 40 0.01 37 36 73 22
46th B. Flushman 25 wd 46 0.00 46 1.00 38 38 76 23


Anchor Rating:
In previous years this section was called the "Drag Index". It was an attempt to reveal which team members most assisted their team and which team members most rode-the-coat-tails of their hot playing partner. This section has not fundamentally changed, however instead of focusing on the negative, "dragging down the team", we've changed our focus on the positive, that is, anchoring the team. Sure, it's still possible to see which teammates most ruined the team's effort, however we're promoting positive thinking now. Before we go any further, we must declare that this is pure folly. A comparison of individual net scores as weighed against the team's net score has little merit. Individual scores are, in fact, inconsequential. However, the club's webmaster couldn't resist spending loads of time devising all sorts of silly tables and spreadsheets. The idea behind the Anchor Rating table below is that the higher the rating the more positive contribution made by the individual. The lower rating indicates greater drag on team's effort. With the table sorted thusly, one can compare the "Anc" (Anchor) column against the "Plc" (place) column for any anomalies. For instance, Hal Teasdale was paired with Clem Shute. Hal literally accounted for all but one stroke of his team's net score. Clem assisted the team effort on only a single hole. Hal's Anchor rating was thus extremely high (.99). Clem nevertheless received a very generous Anchor rating of .86. For this reason this analysis is somewhat meaningless. However, by comparing each teammate's Anchor score (as in the chart below this one), one can gain a more realistic measure of individual contribution.

Ham & Eggs

Interesting to note is that some teammates each had fairly poor anchor indexes, yet placed high. This would indicate a team that had a good deal of ham and eggs taking place, for neither of them could individually account for a dominant or even high degree of contribution to the team's net score. (Ham and Eggs are when one player posts a respectable score, supporting the other player, who is floundering. If both players post bad scores on the same hole, this is a bad thing, and not consistent with what are termed "Ham and Eggs") They therefore must have taken turns scoring well while the other was floundering. This really holds most true in cases where there is not a great deal of difference between the two anchor ratings (list below this one). The ham & eggs factor is the great intangible that makes 2-Ball tournaments exciting. Teams which were unlucky with regard to ham and eggs were abundant. Steve and Robert Desimone ranked 1st and 5th (of 46) in individual net scores, but combined they placed only 4th. Ken Lloyd and Paul Zingg had individual net scores which ranked 2nd and 7th, but as a team they only placed 8th. Steve Obana and Dan Copenhagen's individual net scores ranked 3rd and 4th, but they still only placed 2nd. Topping the list of teams which seem to have enjoyed the largest helping of ham and eggs were Jeff Day and Aaron Walburg. Their individual net scores ranked 6th and 39th, however they gorged on ham and eggs, and placed first. (As a member of this team I can vouch for this, for on only four holes did both players have the same net score. It was uncanny how one player would be launching balls OB while the other was scoring a net birdie.) Rory McDonough and Gary Vollen also had healthy portions of ham and eggs, for their net scores ranked 22nd and 23rd, respectively, however they still placed 5th.

Key to column headers:
Tie = Net tie-breaker
INrnk = Net ranking - Where an individual's performance ranks within all net scores.
Anc = "Anchor" rating - The precise formula is "2-(IndivNet / TeamNet)". This is a very crude approximation meant to reveal how much an individual was responsible for the team's score - the higher the percentage, the greater proportion of positive effect on team score by an individual. For instance, Mike Hearn was playing as a single and was 100% responsible for his team's score.
AncRnk = Anchor rating, ranked among all scores.
AncDif = This is perhaps the most telling measure of team contribution. It's the difference between Anchor ratings between teammates. The higher the number, the more inequality there was between contributions by teammates. 
Plc = Where the team placed.

Member Hcp Out In Grs Net Tie INrnk Anc AncRnk AncDif Out In Net Plc
1st M. Hearn 23 50 49 99 76 37.5 34 1.00 1 1.00 38 38 76 23
2nd H. Teasdale 23 46 47 93 70 35.5 9 0.99 2 0.13 33 36 69 21
3rd K. Lloyd 3 36 34 70 67 32.5 2 0.97 3 0.05 32 33 65 8
4th B. Marchant 16 43 43 86 70 35.0 8 0.96 4 0.10 33 34 67 14
5th D. Moers 5 37 41 78 73 38.5 16 0.94 5 0.03 33 36 69 20
6th D. Lozow 5 38 39 77 72 36.5 11 0.94 6 0.01 34 34 68 18
7th R. Sakamoto 12 44 41 85 73 35.0 14 0.93 7 0.01 34 34 68 18
8th P. Zingg 5 39 36 75 70 33.5 7 0.92 8 0.05 32 33 65 8
9th S. Desimone 2 34 34 68 66 33.0 1 0.92 9 0.05 30 31 61 4
10th M. Kitchener 12 45 42 87 75 36.0 28 0.91 10 0.03 33 36 69 20
11th J. King 25 49 49 98 73 36.5 15 0.91 11 0.07 34 33 67 13
12th V. Hall 7 38 41 79 72 37.5 12 0.91 12 0.06 31 35 66 12
13th R. Guevara 13 39 44 83 70 37.5 10 0.91 13 0.05 29 35 64 6
14th E. Louie 14 47 43 90 76 36.0 33 0.90 14 0.04 37 32 69 19
15th E. Biglin 7 44 38 82 75 34.5 27 0.90 15 0.00 35 33 68 17
C. Maters 8 41 42 83 75 38.0 29 0.90 15 0.00 35 33 68 17
17th C. Brown 14 44 44 88 74 37.0 20 0.90 17 0.04 32 35 67 15
S. Hong 10 39 45 84 74 40.0 23 0.90 17 0.01 30 37 67 16
19th E. Kleinhans 10 38 47 85 75 42.0 31 0.88 19 0.01 30 37 67 16
20th J. Hazel 7 38 42 80 73 38.5 16 0.88 20 0.02 30 35 65 10
21st R. Desimone 7 36 40 76 69 36.5 5 0.87 21 0.05 30 31 61 4
22nd S. Obana 7 37 38 75 68 34.5 3 0.87 22 0.02 31 29 60 2
23rd C. Wallace 24 49 49 98 74 37.0 20 0.86 23 0.02 35 30 65 7
M. Birnbach 12 40 46 86 74 40.0 23 0.86 23 0.02 30 35 65 10
25th C. Carey 7 38 42 80 73 38.5 16 0.86 25 0.05 29 35 64 6
26th E. Joe 15 51 43 94 79 35.5 42 0.86 26 0.04 37 32 69 19
C. Shute 23 51 51 102 79 39.5 43 0.86 26 0.13 33 36 69 21
28th J. Bordalampe 10 41 46 87 77 41.0 37 0.85 28 0.10 33 34 67 14
E. Johnson 12 43 46 89 77 40.0 36 0.85 28 0.04 32 35 67 15
30th A. Walburg 14 38 45 83 69 38.0 6 0.85 30 0.15 31 29 60 1
D. Copenhagen 8 40 37 77 69 33.0 4 0.85 30 0.02 31 29 60 2
32nd D. Webb 5 43 38 81 76 35.5 32 0.85 32 0.06 31 35 66 12
33rd C. Baker 31 57 49 106 75 33.5 26 0.85 33 0.02 35 30 65 7
B. Mccaslin 24 48 51 99 75 39.0 30 0.85 33 0.05 32 33 65 9
35th R. Mcdonough 7 40 41 81 74 37.5 22 0.84 35 0.00 30 34 64 5
G. Vollen 20 44 50 94 74 40.0 23 0.84 35 0.00 30 34 64 5
37th Y. Akinaga 18 48 48 96 78 39.0 41 0.84 37 0.07 34 33 67 13
38th P. Higaki 11 47 49 96 85 43.5 44 0.84 38 0.01 37 36 73 22
39th K. Alvarez 23 53 47 100 77 35.5 35 0.83 39 0.02 33 33 66 11
40th L. Crenna 20 52 54 106 86 44.0 45 0.82 40 0.01 37 36 73 22
41st B. Sternbach 16 50 44 94 78 36.0 38 0.82 41 0.02 33 33 66 11
42nd D. Wherritt 19 43 48 91 72 38.5 13 0.80 42 0.03 29 31 60 3
R. Hill 9 44 43 87 78 38.5 40 0.80 42 0.05 32 33 65 9
44th P. Werner 10 43 41 84 74 36.0 19 0.77 44 0.03 29 31 60 3
45th J. Day 14 47 45 92 78 38.0 39 0.70 45 0.15 31 29 60 1
46th B. Flushman 25 wd 46 0.00 46 1.00 38 38 76 23

 

Anchor Differential

This is the best indicator of Anchor performances and Coat-Tail riding. It compares anchor ratings between teammates. Note that in this list teammates are grouped together to reveal the differences. The numbers don't correlate to anything directly, however the greater the number, the more likely that the teammate listed first was anchoring, while the teammate listed second was riding his partner's coat-tail.

Tie = Net tie-breaker
INrnk = Net ranking - Where an individual's performance ranks within all net scores.
Anc = "Anchor" rating - The precise formula is "2-(IndivNet / TeamNet)". This is a very crude approximation meant to reveal how much an individual was responsible for the team's score - the higher the percentage, the greater proportion of positive effect on team score by an individual. For instance, Mike Hearn was playing as a single and was 100% responsible for his team's score.
AncRnk = Anchor rating, ranked among all scores.
AncDif = This is perhaps the most telling measure of team contribution. It's the difference between Anchor ratings between teammates. The higher the number, the more inequality there was between contributions by teammates. 
Plc = Where the team placed.

Teams Hcp Out In Grs Net Tie INrnk Anc AncRnk AncDif Out In Net Plc
1st M. Hearn 23 50 49 99 76 37.5 34 1.00 1 1.00 38 38 76 23
B. Flushman 25 wd 46 0.00 46 1.00 38 38 76 23
2nd A. Walburg 14 38 45 83 69 38.0 6 0.85 30 0.15 31 29 60 1
J. Day 14 47 45 92 78 38.0 39 0.70 45 0.15 31 29 60 1
3rd H. Teasdale 23 46 47 93 70 35.5 9 0.99 2 0.13 33 36 69 21
C. Shute 23 51 51 102 79 39.5 43 0.86 26 0.13 33 36 69 21
4th B. Marchant 16 43 43 86 70 35.0 8 0.96 4 0.10 33 34 67 14
J. Bordalampe 10 41 46 87 77 41.0 37 0.85 28 0.10 33 34 67 14
5th J. King 25 49 49 98 73 36.5 15 0.91 11 0.07 34 33 67 13
Y. Akinaga 18 48 48 96 78 39.0 41 0.84 37 0.07 34 33 67 13
6th V. Hall 7 38 41 79 72 37.5 12 0.91 12 0.06 31 35 66 12
D. Webb 5 43 38 81 76 35.5 32 0.85 32 0.06 31 35 66 12
7th S. Desimone 2 34 34 68 66 33.0 1 0.92 9 0.05 30 31 61 4
R. Desimone 7 36 40 76 69 36.5 5 0.87 21 0.05 30 31 61 4
R. Guevara 13 39 44 83 70 37.5 10 0.91 13 0.05 29 35 64 6
C. Carey 7 38 42 80 73 38.5 16 0.86 25 0.05 29 35 64 6
K. Lloyd 3 36 34 70 67 32.5 2 0.97 3 0.05 32 33 65 8
P. Zingg 5 39 36 75 70 33.5 7 0.92 8 0.05 32 33 65 8
B. Mccaslin 24 48 51 99 75 39.0 30 0.85 33 0.05 32 33 65 9
R. Hill 9 44 43 87 78 38.5 40 0.80 42 0.05 32 33 65 9
11th C. Brown 14 44 44 88 74 37.0 20 0.90 17 0.04 32 35 67 15
E. Johnson 12 43 46 89 77 40.0 36 0.85 28 0.04 32 35 67 15
E. Louie 14 47 43 90 76 36.0 33 0.90 14 0.04 37 32 69 19
E. Joe 15 51 43 94 79 35.5 42 0.86 26 0.04 37 32 69 19
13th D. Wherritt 19 43 48 91 72 38.5 13 0.80 42 0.03 29 31 60 3
P. Werner 10 43 41 84 74 36.0 19 0.77 44 0.03 29 31 60 3
D. Moers 5 37 41 78 73 38.5 16 0.94 5 0.03 33 36 69 20
M. Kitchener 12 45 42 87 75 36.0 28 0.91 10 0.03 33 36 69 20
15th S. Obana 7 37 38 75 68 34.5 3 0.87 22 0.02 31 29 60 2
D. Copenhagen 8 40 37 77 69 33.0 4 0.85 30 0.02 31 29 60 2
C. Wallace 24 49 49 98 74 37.0 20 0.86 23 0.02 35 30 65 7
C. Baker 31 57 49 106 75 33.5 26 0.85 33 0.02 35 30 65 7
J. Hazel 7 38 42 80 73 38.5 16 0.88 20 0.02 30 35 65 10
M. Birnbach 12 40 46 86 74 40.0 23 0.86 23 0.02 30 35 65 10
K. Alvarez 23 53 47 100 77 35.5 35 0.83 39 0.02 33 33 66 11
B. Sternbach 16 50 44 94 78 36.0 38 0.82 41 0.02 33 33 66 11
19th S. Hong 10 39 45 84 74 40.0 23 0.90 17 0.01 30 37 67 16
E. Kleinhans 10 38 47 85 75 42.0 31 0.88 19 0.01 30 37 67 16
D. Lozow 5 38 39 77 72 36.5 11 0.94 6 0.01 34 34 68 18
R. Sakamoto 12 44 41 85 73 35.0 14 0.93 7 0.01 34 34 68 18
P. Higaki 11 47 49 96 85 43.5 44 0.84 38 0.01 37 36 73 22
L. Crenna 20 52 54 106 86 44.0 45 0.82 40 0.01 37 36 73 22
22nd R. Mcdonough 7 40 41 81 74 37.5 22 0.84 35 0.00 30 34 64 5
G. Vollen 20 44 50 94 74 40.0 23 0.84 35 0.00 30 34 64 5
E. Biglin 7 44 38 82 75 34.5 27 0.90 15 0.00 35 33 68 17
C. Maters 8 41 42 83 75 38.0 29 0.90 15 0.00 35 33 68 17

 

Net Eagles by Player
Last year at the same course, under similarly ideal conditions, we had less players and more net eagles. This alone serves as evidence that the scores were unusually high this year. Last year we had 21 net eagles divided between 36 players. This year we had 8 net eagles between 45 players. The eagles ratio (#eagles / #players) this year was three times lower than last year. Last year a person was 58.3% likely to score a net eagle. This year a person was only 17.8% likely. Also listed are the holes on which the eagles occurred, whether or not the net eagle was the result of strokes received (note Steve's natural eagle on #6), and the place the individual's team finished. 

Member Net Eagles Holes Pop? Placed
1st Clay Wallace 2 3,11 2, 2 7th
2nd Dan Copenhagen 1 12 1 2nd
Steve Desimone 1 6 0 4th
Mike Hearn 1 3 2 23rd
Boyd McCaslin 1 11 2 9th
Gary Vollen 1 1 2 5th
Aaron Walburg 1 3 1 1st


Net Eagles by Hole
There were a total of 8 net eagles on the day. Hole #3 was eagled the most, with three. 

Hole Net Eagles
#1 1
#2 0
#3 3
#4 0
#5 0
#6 1
#7 0
#8 0
#9 0
#10 0
#11 2
#12 1
#13 0
#14 0
#15 0
#16 0
#17 0
#18 0
Total 8

 

Teams With Net Par or Better Every Hole
Last year, of 36 teams, 7 of them (39%) succeeded in avoiding any net bogies or worse throughout the entire round. This year only 2 teams of 23 (9%) succeeded in avoiding bogies. This difference also serves as an indication of how high the scores were this year. For the record, the winning team of Day/Walburg had three net bogies, but they were offset by eleven net birdies, and one net eagle.

Team Net Placed
Robert Desimone & Steve Desimone 61 4th
Ken Lloyd and Paul Zingg 65 8th

 

Yearly Results vs. UCSF

# Year UCGC LBL Winner Our Record
1 2003 24.5 26.5 UCSF 0-1
Total 24.5 26.5

 

 

PREVIEW:
(Or rather, "Evidence of Future Crow-Eating")

UCGC vs. UCSF - a New Grudge Match!

Today our club will be hosting the inaugural Two-Ball Match-up vs. the UCSF Golf Club. Many have wondered whether UCSF is a golf club or simply a bug to be squashed. The answer is "Both!". But honestly, who will draw first blood? Will the more academic and learned, lovers of art and poetry, masters of science and technology, U.C. Berkeley team draw first blood, or will those medicinal marijuana, leach-totting, quacks across the bay clumsily knife their way into an undeserved victory? All will be decided on July 5th in a battle of epic proportions. Warning: Be on the lookout for sharp objects (read “scalpels”) anywhere near your legs (read "Achilles tendon”). These folks are straight out of the dark ages, real butchers, so just keep to a safe distance (read “50-feet”). As has been the tradition, the Two-Ball tournament will be three events in one. 1). Our 2-Ball Championship (a major), 2). the UCGC vs. UCSFGC match, and 3). Qualifier for the Associate Club Four-Ball Net (2-Person Best Ball). The highest-placing team comprised of two players each with indexes of 18.0 or lower will represent UCGC in the NCGA event.


In the News:

Singer Barry white died who had suffered kidney failure from years of high blood pressure, died at Cedars-Sinai Medical Centre Los Angeles, July 4, 2003
 

 

 

© 2000-2005 University of California Golf Club.   All rights reserved.
This site is produced, maintained, and hosted by Aaron Walburg.
Contact Aaron for information on joining the club.
Last updated: November 14, 2006 .