|
2004 Most Improved Golfer |
|
2001 | 2002 |
2003 | 2004
|
Our 2004 Most Improved Golfer was Dave Wherritt. In 2004 Dave
showed the most improvement in his index by lowering it from a 17.6 to a
13.6. It was a very close race. For instance, Ryan Tabibian was the most
improved player between 12/1/03 and 12/1/04. And from 1/1/04 to 1/1/05 Ryan reduced his index from a 15.3
to an 11.7. Only in the final month of the year did David narrowly slip ahead of
Ryan as the most improved player. Indeed, it was so close that it came down to a
single stroke!!! How? The formula for most improved is based upon a starting and
an ending handicap index. Ryan's score in the final tournament (Las Positas)
wasn't good enough to be part of his final index, but David's score at Las
Positas was. David's 85 resulted in a differential of 13.5. His resulting
January index was 13.6. Had David instead shot 86 at Las Positas his resulting
index would have been 13.7. This would have resulted in an Index Ratio (used by
the USGA to determine Most Improved) of 1.1518 rather than
1.1563. If you place 1.1518 in the chart below, you'll note that David would
have only placed 2nd! This is how narrowly David squeaked past Ryan.
The Most Improved Golfer Award is determined using the
USGA's
Most Improved Player Ratio. You may read more about this formula below. In
order for members to be eligible for the Most Improved Golfer Award, they must
be a member in good standing as of January 1st that year. Members can only win
the Most Improved Award once, ever. (This to eliminate those who, for whatever
reason, may repetitively rollercoaster dramatically from season to season.)
Indexes lowered as result of reduction penalty are not eligible. Members must
also have played in at least 5 events to qualify for this award. Below is a list
of all 2004 members, ranked by their USGA Ratio score over the 2004 year.
With a net gain in membership, this was a season in which players,
for the most part, tended to slide in their overall index ranking. This is a
comparative ranking between members. Noteworthy is that David Wherritt and Ryan
Tabibian tied in having
advancing 21 slots
in the club ranking. Ryan Atkinson showed the highest percentage
improvement in his index, going from a 1.8 to a 1.0, he improved his index by
44%! Bruce Flushman
shaved the most
strokes off his 2003 index. Bruce reduced his index from a 27.7 to a 22.9, a
reduction of 4.8 strokes!
|
|
|
|
Idx on |
Idx on |
Idx on |
Idx on |
Idx on |
Idx |
Idx |
Idx |
Rank |
Rank |
Rank |
Rank |
Rank |
Rank |
|
Joined |
|
|
Member |
1/1/2001 |
1/1/2002 |
1/1/2003 |
1/1/2004 |
1/1/2005 |
Chg* |
Rdtn% |
ratio |
2001 |
2002 |
2003 |
2004 |
2005 |
Chg* |
Sex |
UCGC |
|
1 |
Wherritt, David |
NA |
NA |
18.4 |
17.6 |
13.6 |
-4.0 |
-22.73% |
1.1563 |
NA |
NA |
85 |
89 |
68 |
-21 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
2 |
Tabibian, Ryan |
NA |
NA |
NA |
15.3 |
11.7 |
-3.6 |
-23.53% |
1.1543 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
74 |
53 |
-21 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
3 |
Coburn, Brian |
NA |
NA |
NA |
10.9 |
8.1 |
-2.8 |
-25.69% |
1.1407 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
42 |
29 |
-13 |
M |
12/1/2003 |
|
4 |
Flushman, Bruce |
NA |
NA |
NA |
27.7 |
22.9 |
-4.8 |
-17.33% |
1.1375 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
117 |
117 |
0 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
5 |
Marchant, Bill |
NA |
18.1 |
15.6 |
14.7 |
11.9 |
-2.8 |
-19.05% |
1.1209 |
NA |
78 |
68 |
70 |
55 |
-15 |
M |
11/12/2001 |
|
6 |
Guevara, Rick |
11.6 |
12.5 |
13.0 |
12.7 |
10.3 |
-2.4 |
-18.90% |
1.1038 |
38 |
48 |
55 |
53 |
42 |
-11 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
7 |
Mackey, Stacey |
NA |
NA |
25.7 |
22.6 |
19.4 |
-3.2 |
-14.16% |
1.1016 |
NA |
NA |
107 |
106 |
104 |
-2 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
8 |
Armstrong, Mike |
7.6 |
6.7 |
7.2 |
7.8 |
6.0 |
-1.8 |
-23.08% |
1.0985 |
17 |
14 |
16 |
27 |
14 |
-13 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
9 |
Goode, Ted |
18.6 |
19.4 |
16.4 |
17.1 |
15.0 |
-2.1 |
-12.28% |
1.0782 |
80 |
82 |
76 |
84 |
74 |
-10 |
M |
1/19/1999 |
|
10 |
Shute, Clem |
NA |
NA |
23.9 |
23.7 |
21.2 |
-2.5 |
-10.55% |
1.0763 |
NA |
NA |
102 |
109 |
109 |
0 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
11 |
Hearn, Mike |
NA |
NA |
NA |
21.4 |
19.1 |
-2.3 |
-10.75% |
1.0714 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
104 |
103 |
-1 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
12 |
Desimone, Robert |
10.8 |
12.0 |
9.6 |
5.4 |
4.3 |
-1.1 |
-20.37% |
1.0667 |
30 |
40 |
31 |
12 |
6 |
-6 |
M |
9/3/1999 |
|
13 |
Dwyer, John |
4.6 |
5.7 |
5.3 |
5.9 |
4.8 |
-1.1 |
-18.64% |
1.0625 |
5 |
11 |
10 |
13 |
9 |
-4 |
M |
10/19/1992 |
|
14 |
Atkinson, Ryan |
NA |
NA |
NA |
1.8 |
1.0 |
-0.8 |
-44.44% |
1.0617 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
3 |
2 |
-1 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
15 |
Kramp, Greg |
NA |
NA |
6.9 |
6.7 |
5.7 |
-1.0 |
-14.93% |
1.0612 |
NA |
NA |
15 |
18 |
13 |
-5 |
M |
10/11/2001 |
|
16 |
Copenhagen, Dan |
9.9 |
9.3 |
8.2 |
9.4 |
8.2 |
-1.2 |
-12.77% |
1.0592 |
26 |
24 |
22 |
32 |
31 |
-1 |
M |
12/14/1999 |
|
17 |
Holman, Mark |
12.2 |
13.3 |
12.9 |
12.2 |
10.9 |
-1.3 |
-10.66% |
1.0548 |
41 |
55 |
53 |
51 |
46 |
-5 |
M |
12/14/1999 |
|
18 |
Maters, Chris |
7.3 |
8.8 |
7.6 |
10.4 |
9.2 |
-1.2 |
-11.54% |
1.0546 |
15 |
23 |
19 |
39 |
38 |
-1 |
M |
12/15/2000 |
|
19 |
McDonough, Rory |
7.4 |
7.2 |
8.1 |
7.2 |
6.3 |
-0.9 |
-12.50% |
1.0482 |
16 |
18 |
21 |
22 |
15 |
-7 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
20 |
Goode, Glenda |
40.4 |
40.4 |
38.7 |
36.9 |
34.8 |
-2.1 |
-5.69% |
1.0453 |
117 |
115 |
118 |
126 |
129 |
3 |
F |
1/19/1999 |
|
21 |
Greenwood, Russ |
17.7 |
16.5 |
18.8 |
18.3 |
17.0 |
-1.3 |
-7.10% |
1.0439 |
74 |
70 |
87 |
94 |
88 |
-6 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
22 |
Day, Jeff |
NA |
15.9 |
14.5 |
17.1 |
15.9 |
-1.2 |
-7.02% |
1.0429 |
NA |
66 |
63 |
84 |
83 |
-1 |
M |
1/12/2001 |
|
22 |
Sakamoto, Ross |
13.3 |
12.3 |
12.6 |
10.6 |
9.6 |
-1.0 |
-9.43% |
1.0429 |
51 |
47 |
51 |
41 |
39 |
-2 |
M |
12/3/1996 |
|
24 |
Furtado, Tom |
NA |
22.8 |
16.3 |
17.6 |
16.4 |
-1.2 |
-6.82% |
1.0398 |
NA |
96 |
75 |
89 |
85 |
-4 |
M |
12/15/2000 |
|
25 |
Aronson, Chris |
14.1 |
13.0 |
12.1 |
15.1 |
14.1 |
-1.0 |
-6.62% |
1.0393 |
55 |
53 |
46 |
71 |
71 |
0 |
M |
12/28/1992 |
|
26 |
Northfield, Mark |
12.6 |
10.3 |
10.4 |
12.1 |
11.2 |
-0.9 |
-7.44% |
1.0384 |
43 |
31 |
38 |
50 |
48 |
-2 |
M |
3/23/2000 |
|
27 |
Louie, Ed |
NA |
15.3 |
14.3 |
12.7 |
11.8 |
-0.9 |
-7.09% |
1.0382 |
NA |
64 |
62 |
53 |
54 |
1 |
M |
11/7/2001 |
|
28 |
Carlson, John |
8.0 |
7.1 |
7.3 |
7.7 |
7.0 |
-0.7 |
-9.09% |
1.0374 |
19 |
17 |
17 |
24 |
22 |
-2 |
M |
1/9/1995 |
|
29 |
Blom, Ed |
9.0 |
9.5 |
9.9 |
9.1 |
8.3 |
-0.8 |
-8.79% |
1.0363 |
23 |
25 |
36 |
29 |
33 |
4 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
30 |
Kikuchi, John |
NA |
23.7 |
26.9 |
26.4 |
25.2 |
-1.2 |
-4.55% |
1.0330 |
NA |
99 |
110 |
112 |
121 |
9 |
M |
11/12/2001 |
|
31 |
Rose, Dave |
NA |
NA |
17.8 |
17.3 |
16.4 |
-0.9 |
-5.20% |
1.0321 |
NA |
NA |
83 |
87 |
85 |
-2 |
M |
12/18/2001 |
|
32 |
Haag, John |
18.8 |
17.3 |
17.9 |
19.2 |
18.3 |
-0.9 |
-4.69% |
1.0307 |
82 |
75 |
84 |
97 |
99 |
2 |
M |
8/24/1998 |
|
33 |
Johnson, Edgar |
13.0 |
11.9 |
11.6 |
11.7 |
11.0 |
-0.7 |
-5.98% |
1.0288 |
47 |
39 |
42 |
44 |
47 |
3 |
M |
12/9/1997 |
|
34 |
Flowers, Charlie |
13.1 |
12.9 |
12.8 |
13.6 |
12.9 |
-0.7 |
-5.15% |
1.0281 |
49 |
50 |
52 |
66 |
61 |
-5 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
35 |
Lauro, Geraldine |
18.4 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
19.0 |
18.2 |
-0.8 |
-4.21% |
1.0267 |
79 |
80 |
89 |
96 |
97 |
1 |
F |
12/19/1995 |
|
36 |
Zeller, Elliott |
18.0 |
16.7 |
17.2 |
16.4 |
15.7 |
-0.7 |
-4.27% |
1.0253 |
77 |
72 |
80 |
79 |
82 |
3 |
M |
12/16/1998 |
|
37 |
Kleinhans, Edward |
NA |
NA |
10.0 |
9.5 |
8.9 |
-0.6 |
-6.32% |
1.0251 |
NA |
NA |
37 |
33 |
36 |
3 |
M |
3/1/2002 |
|
38 |
Baer, James |
18.8 |
19.7 |
18.4 |
18.2 |
17.5 |
-0.7 |
-3.85% |
1.0250 |
82 |
83 |
85 |
93 |
93 |
0 |
M |
12/2/1994 |
|
38 |
Webb, Dave |
5.1 |
6.3 |
3.2 |
4.5 |
4.1 |
-0.4 |
-8.89% |
1.0250 |
7 |
13 |
5 |
5 |
5 |
0 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
40 |
Kezirian, Vaughn |
9.3 |
10.6 |
9.5 |
11.8 |
11.3 |
-0.5 |
-4.24% |
1.0239 |
24 |
33 |
30 |
46 |
50 |
4 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
41 |
Hall, Van |
5.0 |
5.5 |
7.4 |
6.7 |
6.3 |
-0.4 |
-5.97% |
1.0230 |
6 |
9 |
18 |
18 |
15 |
-3 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
42 |
Higaki, Paul |
10.2R |
14.1 |
14.0 |
7.0 |
6.6 |
-0.4 |
-5.71% |
1.0221 |
28 |
60 |
60 |
21 |
20 |
-1 |
M |
12/14/1999 |
|
43 |
Hazel, Jeff |
7.8 |
6.8 |
8.8 |
6.8 |
6.4 |
-0.4 |
-5.88% |
1.0219 |
18 |
15 |
25 |
20 |
18 |
-2 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
44 |
Peixoto, Marvin |
NA |
16.4 |
19.1 |
17.7 |
17.1 |
-0.6 |
-3.39% |
1.0204 |
NA |
68 |
90 |
91 |
89 |
-2 |
M |
11/12/2001 |
|
45 |
Hillesland, Kevin |
13.4 |
12.1 |
12.2 |
12.8 |
12.4 |
-0.4 |
-3.13% |
1.0161 |
52 |
42 |
47 |
56 |
60 |
4 |
M |
11/21/1995 |
|
46 |
Obana, Steve |
8.6 |
8.6 |
8.8 |
6.6 |
6.3 |
-0.3 |
-4.55% |
1.0146 |
21 |
22 |
25 |
16 |
15 |
-1 |
M |
12/29/1997 |
|
47 |
Diaz, Bob |
NA |
NA |
20.7 |
17.2 |
16.8 |
-0.4 |
-2.33% |
1.0143 |
NA |
NA |
94 |
86 |
87 |
1 |
M |
10/11/2001 |
|
48 |
Hansell, Chris |
NA |
NA |
NA |
11.8 |
11.5 |
-0.3 |
-2.54% |
1.0090 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
46 |
51 |
5 |
M |
10/1/2003 |
|
49 |
Scalise, Sam |
17.7 |
17.1 |
15.6 |
15.5 |
15.3 |
-0.2 |
-1.29% |
1.0081 |
74 |
73 |
68 |
75 |
78 |
3 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
50 |
Brown, Chris |
NA |
NA |
NA |
16.1 |
15.9 |
-0.2 |
-1.24% |
1.0076 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
76 |
83 |
7 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
51 |
Zingg, Paul |
5.3 |
5.9 |
4.5 |
5.0 |
4.9 |
-0.1 |
-2.00% |
1.0051 |
8 |
12 |
8 |
7 |
10 |
3 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
52 |
Steppan, Mark |
2.0 |
2.5 |
3.8 |
4.6 |
4.5 |
-0.1 |
-2.17% |
1.0029 |
3 |
5 |
6 |
6 |
7 |
1 |
M |
8/24/1998 |
|
53 |
Tulk, Bob |
14.9 |
12.2 |
12.3 |
10.9 |
10.8 |
-0.1 |
-0.92% |
1.0025 |
62 |
43 |
48 |
42 |
44 |
2 |
M |
4/15/1997 |
|
54 |
Chernock, Mitch |
26.7 |
26.2 |
26.2 |
26.4 |
26.4 |
0.0 |
0.00% |
1.0000 |
105 |
105 |
109 |
112 |
122 |
10 |
M |
2/12/1996 |
|
54 |
Dea, George |
36.1 |
36.1 |
36.1 |
36.1 |
36.1 |
0.0 |
0.00% |
1.0000 |
116 |
114 |
117 |
125 |
130 |
5 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
54 |
Geiser, Saul |
NA |
NA |
7.9 |
5.2 |
5.2 |
0.0 |
0.00% |
1.0000 |
NA |
NA |
20 |
10 |
11 |
1 |
M |
11/12/2001 |
|
54 |
Hidalgo, Ben |
23.5 |
23.5 |
23.5 |
23.5 |
23.5 |
0.0 |
0.00% |
1.0000 |
96 |
97 |
100 |
108 |
118 |
10 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
54 |
Lee, David |
26.1 |
24.1 |
24.1 |
24.1 |
24.1 |
0.0 |
0.00% |
1.0000 |
104 |
100 |
103 |
110 |
119 |
9 |
M |
3/13/2000 |
|
54 |
Moore, Calvin |
9.6 |
9.6 |
9.6 |
9.6 |
9.6 |
0.0 |
0.00% |
1.0000 |
25 |
26 |
31 |
34 |
39 |
5 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
54 |
Sharma, Ram |
21.1 |
27.8 |
28.2 |
28.2 |
28.2 |
0.0 |
0.00% |
1.0000 |
90 |
106 |
112 |
119 |
125 |
6 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
61 |
King, Jack |
23.3 |
25.7 |
25.9 |
26.6 |
26.8 |
0.2 |
0.75% |
0.9948 |
94 |
104 |
108 |
114 |
123 |
9 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
62 |
Simonds, Robert |
20.6 |
22.1 |
22.4 |
21.7 |
21.9 |
0.2 |
0.92% |
0.9943 |
88 |
92 |
97 |
105 |
111 |
6 |
M |
4/23/1996 |
|
63 |
Meredith, Scott |
15.2 |
16.1 |
16.0 |
15.1 |
15.2 |
0.1 |
0.66% |
0.9940 |
64 |
67 |
72 |
71 |
76 |
5 |
M |
11/10/1994 |
|
64 |
Otto, Rollie |
14.4 |
12.9 |
12.9 |
12.7 |
12.9 |
0.2 |
1.57% |
0.9931 |
58 |
50 |
53 |
53 |
61 |
8 |
M |
7/11/2000 |
|
65 |
Desimone, Bob |
24.4 |
23.6 |
25.3 |
27.0 |
27.3 |
0.3 |
1.11% |
0.9929 |
99 |
98 |
105 |
116 |
124 |
8 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
66 |
Traum, Bob |
24.3 |
22.4 |
23.2 |
22.6 |
22.8 |
0.2 |
0.89% |
0.9926 |
98 |
95 |
99 |
106 |
116 |
10 |
M |
9/18/1992 |
|
67 |
Boguski, Mark |
19.7 |
20.5 |
19.3 |
19.3 |
19.6 |
0.3 |
1.55% |
0.9906 |
85 |
86 |
91 |
98 |
105 |
7 |
M |
12/14/1999 |
|
67 |
Larson, Garrett |
NA |
NA |
1.6 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
-0.1 |
-12.50% |
0.9906 |
NA |
NA |
2 |
2 |
1 |
-1 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
69 |
Schriger, Ed |
20.4 |
19.1 |
18.8 |
18.0 |
18.2 |
0.2 |
1.11% |
0.9902 |
87 |
81 |
87 |
92 |
97 |
5 |
M |
12/16/1998 |
|
70 |
Chinn, Annette |
32.2 |
32.2 |
32.2 |
32.7 |
33.3 |
0.6 |
1.84% |
0.9888 |
111 |
110 |
114 |
124 |
128 |
4 |
F |
12/26/2001 |
|
71 |
Kitchener, Martin |
14.3 |
14.9 |
11.6 |
13.1 |
13.4 |
0.3 |
2.29% |
0.9883 |
57 |
63 |
42 |
59 |
66 |
7 |
M |
7/6/2000 |
|
72 |
Hong, Steven |
NA |
NA |
NA |
7.7 |
7.9 |
0.2 |
2.60% |
0.9880 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
24 |
28 |
4 |
M |
2/1/2003 |
|
73 |
Walburg, Aaron |
14.2 |
13.5 |
13.5 |
12.9 |
13.2 |
0.3 |
2.33% |
0.9878 |
56 |
57 |
57 |
57 |
64 |
7 |
M |
12/16/1998 |
|
74 |
Alvarez, Kelly |
20.0 |
22.3 |
22.3 |
18.4 |
18.8 |
0.4 |
2.17% |
0.9869 |
86 |
93 |
96 |
95 |
102 |
7 |
M |
10/26/1994 |
|
75 |
Wade, Don |
16.2 |
17.3 |
17.6 |
20.5 |
20.9 |
0.4 |
1.95% |
0.9857 |
67 |
75 |
81 |
102 |
108 |
6 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
75 |
Woods, Barry |
12.1 |
12.2 |
12.4 |
11.7 |
12.1 |
0.4 |
3.42% |
0.9857 |
40 |
43 |
49 |
44 |
58 |
14 |
M |
2/22/1999 |
|
77 |
Crawford, Rick |
11.0 |
9.9 |
11.8 |
11.9 |
12.3 |
0.4 |
3.36% |
0.9827 |
32 |
27 |
44 |
48 |
59 |
11 |
M |
10/21/1996 |
|
78 |
Moers, David |
NA |
NA |
NA |
6.6 |
7.0 |
0.4 |
6.06% |
0.9783 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
16 |
22 |
6 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
79 |
Wright, Peter |
11.3 |
11.3 |
13.3 |
13.4 |
14.0 |
0.6 |
4.48% |
0.9775 |
35 |
36 |
56 |
63 |
70 |
7 |
M |
1/16/1996 |
|
80 |
Biglin, Ed |
6.4 |
6.9 |
8.3 |
7.7 |
8.2 |
0.5 |
6.49% |
0.9758 |
12 |
16 |
23 |
24 |
31 |
7 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
81 |
Vollen, Gary |
26.0 |
21.9 |
22.5 |
21.2 |
22.1 |
0.9 |
4.25% |
0.9739 |
103 |
90 |
98 |
103 |
115 |
12 |
M |
2/20/1998 |
|
82 |
Siegel, Mark |
NA |
NA |
15.1 |
14.6 |
15.3 |
0.7 |
4.79% |
0.9709 |
NA |
NA |
64 |
69 |
78 |
9 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
83 |
Kang, Andrew |
14.6 |
13.2 |
12.5 |
13.3 |
14.1 |
0.8 |
6.01% |
0.9699 |
60 |
54 |
50 |
62 |
71 |
9 |
M |
11/22/1999 |
|
84 |
Powell, Jerry |
15.3 |
15.6 |
15.7 |
16.6 |
17.6 |
1.0 |
6.02% |
0.9689 |
65 |
65 |
70 |
81 |
94 |
13 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
85 |
Lloyd, Ken |
5.3 |
5.5 |
5.3 |
5.0 |
5.5 |
0.5 |
10.00% |
0.9683 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
7 |
12 |
5 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
86 |
Lee, Charles |
NA |
NA |
16.0 |
20.2R |
21.3 |
1.1 |
5.45% |
0.9669 |
NA |
NA |
72 |
100 |
110 |
10 |
M |
3/1/2002 |
|
87 |
Sternbach, Bob |
21.9 |
21.9 |
20.2 |
16.1 |
17.1 |
1.0 |
6.21% |
0.9664 |
92 |
90 |
93 |
76 |
89 |
13 |
M |
10/26/1994 |
|
88 |
Podoll, Todd |
NA |
NA |
NA |
14.2 |
15.2 |
1.0 |
7.04% |
0.9654 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
68 |
76 |
8 |
M |
10/20/2003 |
|
89 |
Sanguinetti, Steve |
NA |
10.2 |
8.8 |
7.4 |
8.1 |
0.7 |
9.46% |
0.9652 |
NA |
30 |
25 |
23 |
29 |
6 |
M |
8/22/2001 |
|
90 |
Akinaga, Yun |
16.8 |
17.4 |
15.1 |
17.3 |
18.4 |
1.1 |
6.36% |
0.9643 |
71 |
77 |
64 |
87 |
100 |
13 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
91 |
Tachiera, Dan |
NA |
3.5 |
3.0 |
3.9 |
4.6 |
0.7 |
17.95% |
0.9613 |
NA |
6 |
4 |
4 |
8 |
4 |
M |
5/25/2001 |
|
92 |
Kubota, Eric |
16.7 |
17.1 |
17.1 |
16.2 |
17.4 |
1.2 |
7.41% |
0.9602 |
70 |
73 |
79 |
78 |
91 |
13 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
93 |
Steele, Dale |
29.9 |
28.5 |
28.9 |
29.0 |
30.7 |
1.7 |
5.86% |
0.9596 |
108 |
107 |
113 |
121 |
127 |
6 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
94 |
Ikeda, Jim |
NA |
NA |
NA |
9.8 |
10.8 |
1.0 |
10.20% |
0.9579 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
37 |
44 |
7 |
M |
11/7/2001 |
|
95 |
Bordalampe, Jeff |
NA |
NA |
10.9 |
9.6 |
10.7 |
1.1 |
11.46% |
0.9544 |
NA |
NA |
39 |
34 |
43 |
9 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
96 |
Smith, Dennis |
16.9 |
19.7 |
16.2 |
16.7 |
18.1 |
1.4 |
8.38% |
0.9529 |
72 |
83 |
74 |
82 |
96 |
14 |
M |
12/18/1992 |
|
97 |
Crenna, Lloyd |
21.4 |
20.4 |
21.3 |
20.4 |
22.0 |
1.6 |
7.84% |
0.9521 |
91 |
85 |
95 |
101 |
113 |
12 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
98 |
McCaslin, Boyd |
18.7 |
20.5 |
24.4 |
26.8 |
28.9 |
2.1 |
7.84% |
0.9492 |
81 |
86 |
104 |
115 |
126 |
11 |
M |
12/26/2000 |
|
99 |
Lozow, David |
9.9 |
7.9 |
5.0 |
6.2 |
7.2 |
1.0 |
16.13% |
0.9467 |
26 |
20 |
9 |
14 |
24 |
10 |
M |
10/3/1994 |
|
100 |
Birnbach, Mike |
13.1 |
12.2 |
11.2 |
12.0 |
13.4 |
1.4 |
11.67% |
0.9453 |
49 |
43 |
41 |
49 |
66 |
17 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
101 |
Desimone, Steve |
0.7 |
2.3 |
2.4 |
0.7 |
1.5 |
0.8 |
114.29% |
0.9350 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
1 |
3 |
2 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
102 |
Gallagher, Ron |
NA |
13.8 |
13.8 |
13.4 |
15.1 |
1.7 |
12.69% |
0.9347 |
NA |
59 |
58 |
63 |
75 |
12 |
M |
6/29/2001 |
|
103 |
Peretti, Jim |
7.0 |
4.8 |
6.2 |
5.3 |
6.5 |
1.2 |
22.64% |
0.9313 |
14 |
8 |
13 |
11 |
19 |
8 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
104 |
Reed, Eddie |
13.6 |
13.7 |
13.8 |
16.5 |
18.7 |
2.2 |
13.33% |
0.9298 |
54 |
58 |
58 |
80 |
101 |
21 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
105 |
Chia, Dave |
12.9 |
14.7 |
15.1 |
13.5 |
15.4 |
1.9 |
14.07% |
0.9290 |
44 |
62 |
64 |
65 |
80 |
15 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
106 |
Carey, Chad |
NA |
NA |
5.6 |
6.2 |
7.6 |
1.4 |
22.58% |
0.9282 |
NA |
NA |
12 |
14 |
25 |
11 |
M |
12/3/2001 |
|
107 |
Smith, Greg |
NA |
NA |
NA |
10.3 |
12.0 |
1.7 |
16.51% |
0.9281 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
38 |
56 |
18 |
M |
12/1/2003 |
|
108 |
O'Neill, Mike |
10.5 |
10.4 |
9.6 |
9.2 |
11.2 |
2.0 |
21.74% |
0.9121 |
29 |
32 |
31 |
30 |
48 |
18 |
M |
pre-1992 |
|
109 |
Robertson, John |
5.5 |
4.4 |
4.0 |
5.1 |
6.9 |
1.8 |
35.29% |
0.9067 |
10 |
7 |
7 |
9 |
21 |
12 |
M |
3/16/1995 |
|
110 |
Berg, Gordon |
13.0 |
13.4 |
9.7 |
9.7 |
12.0 |
2.3 |
23.71% |
0.9046 |
47 |
56 |
34 |
36 |
56 |
20 |
M |
1/9/1995 |
|
111 |
Teasdale, Hal |
NA |
NA |
NA |
17.0 |
20.3 |
3.3 |
19.41% |
0.8975 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
83 |
107 |
24 |
M |
12/1/2002 |
|
112 |
Werner, Peter |
NA |
NA |
11.0 |
10.5 |
13.2 |
2.7 |
25.71% |
0.8896 |
NA |
NA |
40 |
40 |
64 |
24 |
M |
3/1/2002 |
|
NA |
Adelman, Craig |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
7.6 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
25 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Andrews, Kathy |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NH |
NH |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
127 |
NA |
NA |
F |
12/1/2002 |
|
NA |
Chun, Walter |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
2.0 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
4 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Curtis, William |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NH |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Eun, Gene |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
10.2 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
41 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Grant, Kevin |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
14.9 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
73 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Greenspan, Ben |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
13.8 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
69 |
NA |
M |
6/1/1980 |
|
NA |
Griffith, Ned |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NH |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Kendall, Kevin |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
21.9 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
111 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Kent, Allen |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
19.9 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
106 |
NA |
M |
6/1/1994 |
|
NA |
Koneffklatt, Steve |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
17.9 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
95 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Lee, Bryan |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NH |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Lord, Paul |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
11.5 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
51 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Mackenzie, Peter |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
8.6 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
34 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Manning, Bill |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
13.0 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
63 |
NA |
M |
6/1/1984 |
|
NA |
Nilson, David |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
7.7 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
27 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
O'Neill, Sean |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NH |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Rabedeaux, Steve |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
22.0 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
113 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Rice, Brad |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
9.0 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
37 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Rollins, Al |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NH |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Sutton, Jamie |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NH |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Takasaki, Earl |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NH |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Thomas, Jeff |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NH |
15.4 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
127 |
80 |
-47 |
M |
12/1/2003 |
|
NA |
Upshaw, Charles |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NH |
NH |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
127 |
NA |
NA |
M |
12/1/2003 |
|
NA |
Walsh, Tim |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
17.4 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
91 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
West, Richard |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
25.0 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
120 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
NA |
Ybarra, Christopher |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
8.7 |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
NA |
35 |
NA |
M |
2004 |
|
* - All comparisons between years occur between indexes
on 1/1/04 and 1/1/05. 1/1/01, 1/1/02, and 1/1/03 indexes are listed merely for viewing.
Idx Chg - (Index Change) This is the reduction or
increase in the individual's index between January 2004 and January 2005.
Idx Rdtn% - This column ranks by percentage reduction each person's index
from January 2004 to January 2005. In other words it highlights which golfer
reduced his/her index by the highest percentage against last year's index.
Idx Ratio - This calculation is used to determine our annual Most
Improved Golfer Award recipient. It's an NCGA formula.
Rank 2001 - Member's January 2001 index ranked among other club members.
Rank 2002 - Member's January 2002 index ranked among other club members.
Rank 2003 - Member's January 2003 index ranked among other club members.
Rank 2004 - Member's January 2004 index ranked among other club members.
Rank 2005 - Member's January 2005 index ranked among other club members.
Rank Change - Position change in member's rank between January 2003 index and
January 2004
index. Negative numbers mean member's rank has slipped.
Sex - UCGC membership divided by sex and listed alphabetically.
Joined UCGC - Date which member joined the UCGC. Records only date back
to January 1992. Many members have been with the club for 20-30 years.
R - Reduction - USGA Handicap Index reduction for exceptional tournament scores.
When players have two or more eligible tournament scores with differentials at least three strokes better than
their USGA Handicap Indexes, an alternate calculation is used to determine their USGA Handicap
Indexes. (See Section
10-3 of the USGA Handbook)
New Members for 2005
The UCGC would like to send a WARM
WELCOME to the following new members. Many on this list have already been members for several months, however
2005 will mark their first full season. These "rookies" will be offering up new
competition in each flight, including our championship flight.
- Craig Adelman
- Walter Chun
- William Curtis
- Gene Eun
- Kevin Grant
- Ben Greenspan
- Ned Griffith
- Kevin Kendall
- Allen Kent
- Steve Koneffklatt
- Bryan Lee
- Paul Lord
|
- Peter Mackenzie
- Bill Manning
- David Nilson
- Sean O'Neill
- Steve Rabedeaux
- Brad Rice
- Al Rollins
- Jamie Sutton
- Earl Takasaki
- Tim Walsh
- Richard West
- Christopher Ybarra
|
|
The Formula
Over the past few years we've used a most-improved formula which
was developed by Aaron . Begining with this year (current date is 1/1/05) we're using the
USGA's
Most Improved Player Formula (as
specified below). Primarily we wish for equity.
USGA
Handicap System manual:
Misc./1. Method for Determining Most Improved Golfer
Q: What method for determining the winner of a club’s most improved golfer award
does the USGA recommend?
A: The USGA recommends the following method: Add 12 to the player’s USGA
Handicap Index at the start of the season. This is value A. Add 12 to the
player’s USGA Handicap Index at the end of the season. This is value B.
Divide value A by value B, calculating to three decimal places. This is the
improvement factor. The player with the highest improvement factor should
receive the most improved golfer award.
Add 6 instead of 12 in the case of nine-hole players.
Example:
Starting Handicap Index:
22.6
Ending Handicap Index:
17.4
Value A:
22.6 + 12=34.6
Value B:
17.4 + 12=29.4
A / B:
34.6 / 29.4=1.177
Improvement Factor:
1.177
Continue this process for every golfer who improved during the year. The player
with the highest improvement factor is the most improved player.
The
USGA Handicap System manual is available online at
http://www.usga.org.
|
|